Dick, I have not seen the particular file you refer too, but I have prints here from test files (from P1 CDs) going back to the late 90s and they are all excellent. I suspect a dodgy file not a poor back. My work has changed from predominantly studio based work in the 90s to 95% location work in the last few years, so I never did get one of their backs. However I am now using Capture One DSLR for my RAW conversion and it gives me a better file than anything on the market ( I have recently tried and rejected the Adobe offering due to bad moir� etc etc).
> Has any body else tried printing the Phase One Champagne test file? > I thought that it was only the 4 to 6Mpixel DSLRs that were > that rough! > Can't a decent 16Mpixel digiback produce a sharper picture > than MF film? Nick WB. =============================================================== GO TO http://www.prodig.org for ~ GUIDELINES ~ un/SUBSCRIBING ~ ITEMS for SALE
