If the shoe fits, go ahead and put it on. If not, discard the comment. 

Thanks,

John

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Anthony L. Testi
Sent: Monday, September 11, 2006 1:42 PM
To: ProFox Email List
Subject: RE: [OT] Another Bush Lie

'We are at war, get over it."
Was that comment directed at me?  If so why?
Anthony
>

-----Original Message-----
>From: john harvey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

>
>To lie means to knowingly make a false statement. A statement that is made,
>based on faulty information, is not necessarily a lie. It's the old truth
>tables from Logic 101. The conclusions he reached were the same as the
>Democrats who were given the same information and voted FOR the war. Why
are
>we continuing to plow this same ground. The decision to go to war was
>bi-partisan. The data was flawed, but both parties voted based on it. That
>data came from multiple sources, not just U.S. Intel. We are at war, get
>over it.
>
>John
>


Anthony L. Testi


[excessive quoting removed by server]

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to