Robert Calco wrote: > "economic, social, and environmental sustainability"..."improved > equity"..."social equity"... This is science? Please. It's the same > visceral reaction you and others have to supposedly objective reports > with words like "freedom" and "individual responsibility" and > "liberty" in them. ;) >
I really don't get your reasoning. Are "improved equity" or "social equity" opposed to "freedom" or to "individual responsibility" in your mind? Do you have any issues with "improved equity"? Is equity a bad thing? How about when equity is applied to men... as in "all men are created equal", do you oppose it? And "social equity", would you prefer an unfair society? Do you strife for "social un-equity"? As of me, I think that to achieve "improved social equity" is part of everyone's "individual responsibility" so that every social actor can have and enjoy his individual "freedom". _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
