> > Just because something isn't broken, doesn't mean it can't be done > > better. Innovation in technology shouldn't be held back by 'if it > > ain't broke' mentality-- 'if it ain't broke' mentality is more an > > argument for business ROI evaluations.
> Isn't that exactly what is being discussed? Apps that are being re- > written simply because Microsoft announces a new way to develop them, > without regard for ROI? My interpretation is that the line is being considerably blurred by some on this list at times with the technology itself under attack instead of the "push to rewrite" itself... -- Derek _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
