Paul Hill wrote: > On Feb 12, 2008 9:11 AM, Pete Theisen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Tuesday 12 February 2008 02:14, Paul Hill wrote: >>>> they lead you to believe it has nothing to do with Muslims. >>> Because it hasn't. Where are you getting this crap from? >> Hi Paul! >> >> I wonder if he was looking at the table lower on the page? >> >> "Table shows number of attacks according to FBU figures > > [snip] All scummy inner-city areas. None of which I recognise as > predominately Muslim areas. > >> Another opinion: >> http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/faith/article3176455.ece > > WTF has that got to do with this??? > >> So, Paul, what is the predominant religion of folks in South Yorkshire, Tyne >> and Wear, Cleveland, Durham and Darlington and Lancashire anyway - Baptist? > > Christian of some sort, probably Protestant. A very quick search: > > South Yorkshire: 95.0% White > Tyne and Wear: 96.8% White > Lancashire: 93.4% White >
What????? Why the hell do you bring the real world up? Can't you see this has NOTHING to do with reality? _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
