On Feb 12, 2008 10:19 AM, Pete Theisen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tuesday 12 February 2008 04:51, Paul Hill wrote: > Hi Paul! > > > [snip] All scummy inner-city areas. None of which I recognise as > > predominately Muslim areas. > > So it is a poverty association rather than religious?
Yes! > > > Another opinion: > > > http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/faith/article3176455.ece > > > > WTF has that got to do with this??? > > He is talking about Muslims, as Michael is. But as I said the article has nothing to do with Muslims. It's about *drunk* inner city chavs attacking the fire service. > > > So, Paul, what is the predominant religion of folks in South Yorkshire, > > > Tyne and Wear, Cleveland, Durham and Darlington and Lancashire anyway - > > > Baptist? > > > > Christian of some sort, probably Protestant. A very quick search: > > > > South Yorkshire: 95.0% White > > Tyne and Wear: 96.8% White > > Lancashire: 93.4% White > > No link? I was searching for the same stuff and got nothing. Are "Muslims" > classified as "white" in these population figures? Could be, maybe. Wikipedia. Muslims generally are not white. -- Paul _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: [email protected] Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
