I have considered looking at GPG for eMail, but never got around to it. There are a few times when I prefer to have the content of my eMail not readable by just anyone - although I do make every reasonable effort to not expose too much smewhat sensitive info via Clear Text transport. With your esteemed prodding I will look at GPG, and see if it makes sense for me.
Thanks you! Gil (my non-evil other self) > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Ted Roche > Sent: Friday, April 18, 2008 8:42 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [NF] Rackspace Noteworthy product > > > On Thu, Apr 17, 2008 at 7:52 AM, Gil Hale <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > And whenever I transmit any confidential information > > I will only send it as an eMail attachment or ftp transfer > after the file > > has been encrypted at at least 128bit (ZipGenius at 256bit Blowfish). > > You might want to look at GPG. That allows you to encrypt email and > attachments, verify the integrity of mail from folks you trust, and > more. GPG has nice integration into Thunderbird with Enigmail. That > way, you don't need to trust your email service provider, whomever > they might be. > > -- > Ted Roche > Ted Roche & Associates, LLC > http://www.tedroche.com > > [excessive quoting removed by server] _______________________________________________ Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] ** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.
