Stephen Russell wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 10:33 PM, Jerry Wolper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> don't you need a digital antenna too?
>> No. The bowtie/halo part of the antenna should get the digital signal
>> that's broadcast on UHF. It's an all-or-nothing proposition, though.
>> Weak signals that came in poorly in analog won't come in at all
>> digitally.
> -------------------------------
> 
> Well it is all on the location of the towers.  If the new digital ones
> are closer it will be better.  My dad found that the digital reception
> was much better than the traditional because the digital towers were
> close to his house and the old ones were on the other side of town.
> Roswell NM.

Hi Stephen!

I think the same tower will host the digital signal. Florida companies 
are too cheap to do anything else.
-- 
Regards,

Pete
http://pete-theisen.com/


_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to