Jimmy Carter did nothing positive for the country.  He gave us high 
unemployment and high interest rates.

George Bush gave us tax cuts, 7 years of safety after 9/11, the removal of the 
Taliban from power, the removal of Saddam Hussein from power, the dismantling 
of the Libyan atomic program, and 7 years of prosperity.  

************************************************* 
1/20/2013 Eviction Notice

http://www.cafepress.com/rightwingmike/6169336


--- On Wed, 1/28/09, Geoff Flight <data...@adam.com.au> wrote:

> From: Geoff Flight <data...@adam.com.au>
> Subject: RE: [OT] Chaves warms to Obama after character reference from Castro
> To: "'ProFox Email List'" <profox@leafe.com>
> Date: Wednesday, January 28, 2009, 7:30 PM
> I am fully aware of term limits (which I think are insanely
> anti-democratic
> by the way). But the vote was very much a repudiation of
> George Bush more so
> than McCain or Republican politics. And I'm only
> quoting what a lot of other
> people are saying that GWB is the worst President in living
> memory. His
> disapproval ratings are the worse on over 50 years and then
> only just so.
> Jimmy Carter was weak and ineffectual but still stands
> above Bush in most
> people's estimation.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: profox-boun...@leafe.com
> [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf
> Of Michael Oke, II
> Sent: Thursday, 29 January 2009 10:24 AM
> To: ProFox Email List
> Subject: Re: [OT] Chaves warms to Obama after character
> reference from
> Castro
> 
> Geoff,
> Not convenient at all and fairly easy to substantiate
> actually.
> 
> As you don't reside in the US I guess that I'll
> have to forgive you for 
> not realizing the Bush (a) was not running in this election
> and (b) 
> could not run for a third term even though many from the
> lunatic fringe 
> were positive that he would do something, anything to
> ensure that his 
> presidency continued.
> 
> Not exactly sure what you mean by living memory but, based
> on my guess 
> of what you are implying, I can come up with at least one
> president that 
> served during my lifetime that was worse.  Of course, that
> would only be 
> my opinion but I figure that I'm entitled to that.
> 
> ::michael
> 
> Geoff Flight wrote:
> > A tad convenient explanation don't you think? Or
> is it a problem that he
> > raised so much money - as did Clinton? Perhaps there
> were massive numbers
> of
> > Americans willing to give just to get rid of Bush,
> whom many believe to be
> > the worst President in living memory.
> > 
> 
[excessive quoting removed by server]

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/424146.83377...@web31405.mail.mud.yahoo.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to