Though not my usual position on J development, I'd support decommissioning 13 : 
.  

I see its function as more appropriate to a standard library than a primitive.  
For one thing, libraries are easier to change than primitives, and therefore 
more amenable to user feedback.  

For another, I see 13 : 's role as primarily pedagogical, and the script could 
include additional teaching material that a primitive cannot. Also, I think 
using a script would discourage inappropriate (ab)use of the transformation, 
like blindly trusting it, or believing it has a role outside of learning how to 
write tacit verbs.

-Dan

PS: A note on usage; if we want an adverb to convert a (quoted) noun phrase to 
a tacit verb, then we only need to say  13 :  .  There is no need for curry, as 
in 13 & : , and in fact that phrase is a grammatical (syntax) error.  Currying 
is only needed to bind a noun to a verb.  Conjunctions like  :  have binding 
power already (in fact, that's why & is a conjunction).


-----Original Message-----
From: programming-boun...@jsoftware.com 
[mailto:programming-boun...@jsoftware.com] On Behalf Of Devon McCormick
Sent: Saturday, March 17, 2012 2:07 PM
To: Programming forum
Subject: Re: [Jprogramming] why=: 13 :'y*y*y'

It's not a good advertisement for J when something so simple is so
clearly wrong.  I would certainly rank fixing an obvious bug over,
say, a performance improvement in a little-used feature like look-up
of symbolic names.

On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 1:26 PM, Tracy Harms <kalei...@gmail.com> wrote:
> To clarify, I do think 13&: could be improved. I think your examples can
> help with that. I don't find flaws in this modifier very interesting among
> possible improvement efforts.
> On Mar 17, 2012 3:45 AM, "Linda Alvord" <lindaalv...@verizon.net> wrote:
>
>> David Ward Lambert pointed out the known pitfall that occurs using  : 13 :
>>
>>
>>
>> Would these examples help in correcting the problem?
>>
>>
>>
>>   why=: 13 :'y+y'  NB. wrong
>>
>>   why
>>
>> +
>>
>>   why 3
>>
>> 3
>>
>>   why=: 13 :'y-y'  NB. right
>>
>>   why
>>
>> -~
>>
>>   why 3
>>
>> 0
>>
>>   why=: 13 :'y*y'  NB. wrong
>>
>>   why
>>
>> *
>>
>>   why 3
>>
>> 1
>>
>>   why=: 13 :'y%y'  NB. right
>>
>>   why
>>
>> %~
>>
>>   why 3
>>
>> 1
>>
>>   why=: 13 :'y+y+y' NB. wrong
>>
>>   why
>>
>> ] + +
>>
>>   why 3
>>
>> 6
>>
>>   why=: 13 :'y-y-y'  NB. right
>>
>>   why
>>
>> ] - -~
>>
>>   why 3
>>
>> 3
>>
>>   why=: 13 :'y*y*y'  NB. wrong
>>
>>   why
>>
>> ] * *
>>
>>   why 3
>>
>> 3
>>
>>   why=: 13 :'y%y%y'  NB. right
>>
>>   why
>>
>> ] % %~
>>
>>   why 3
>>
>> 3
>>
>>
>>
>> Linda
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
>>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm



-- 
Devon McCormick, CFA
^me^ at acm.
org is my
preferred e-mail
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

Reply via email to