Just to let everyone know, I've found the problem: in line 88 of pv.c, there's a line using swapc that should only use swap in some cases. This makes it so that 13 :'y+x' +~ but it's an improvement for the present.
Marshall On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 9:12 AM, Raul Miller <rauldmil...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 12:35 AM, Edward Mokurai Cherlin > <moku...@sugarlabs.org> wrote: > > On Mon, March 19, 2012 4:10 pm, Raul Miller wrote: > >> If I am right, the simple solution would be to remove that > >> simplification when the arguments are not available (which might be > >> always). > > > > But the problem occurs precisely when the arguments are available, as > > in 'y+y' or 'y+x'. > > Available to 13 : does not mean available to some implementation > routine which processes fragments of intermediate results within 13 : > > Specifically: while we can hypothesize that such information should be > made avaialble, I currently have no idea how much code would have to > be changed to actually make it available. > > -- > Raul > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
