The original intent of 13 : y was good, translating from explicit to
tacit, and it's a relatively simple task.  The objective soon got
subverted (by me) into making it produce results that can compete with
the best that a human writer (me) can do, and that is difficult and
complicated.  The fix now, as someone has already suggested, is to
strip out any unnecessary stuff.  When I get a spare day or two (ha!)
I will do this, unless someone beats me to it in the meanwhile.

x -> [
y -> ]
root function monadic -> [: f exp
root function dyadic -> exp0 f exp1



On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 8:33 AM, Marshall Lochbaum <mwlochb...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Just to let everyone know, I've found the problem: in line 88 of pv.c,
> there's a line using swapc that should only use swap in some cases. This
> makes it so that
>   13 :'y+x'
> +~
> but it's an improvement for the present.
>
> Marshall
>
> On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 9:12 AM, Raul Miller <rauldmil...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 12:35 AM, Edward Mokurai Cherlin
>> <moku...@sugarlabs.org> wrote:
>> > On Mon, March 19, 2012 4:10 pm, Raul Miller wrote:
>> >> If I am right, the simple solution would be to remove that
>> >> simplification when the arguments are not available (which might be
>> >> always).
>> >
>> > But the problem occurs precisely when the arguments are available, as
>> > in 'y+y' or 'y+x'.
>>
>> Available to 13 : does not mean available to some implementation
>> routine which processes fragments of intermediate results within 13 :
>>
>> Specifically: while we can hypothesize that such information should be
>> made avaialble, I currently have no idea how much code would have to
>> be changed to actually make it available.
>>
>> --
>> Raul
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
>>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm

Reply via email to