Hi Alexander,
Il giorno gio, 22/07/2010 alle 08.32 +0200, Alexander Wagner ha scritto:
> Hm, WHY would those documents live WITHIN the original document? Say I
> have a paper for publication, that has a bibliographic set like author,
> title and so on. Now I have the referee report as you mention it. But
> this is not what the bibliographic set of the original document refers
> to, so they do both not share the same metadata. IMHO this referee
> report should not be attached to the paper itself, but it is its very
> own bibliographic entity, it has another document type like "referee
> report", it has another author and so on. IMHO one should consider to
> map the relationship of both records by inter record linking. Then I
> think the problem you mention just disappears as each author always has
> access to his own documents but the linkage is only activated once the
> referee report is finished and then the actual referee report gets the
> status of "published". (Could be some function that writes the ID of the
> report to the refereed papers MARC data.)
thank you very much for the answer.
Indeed that sound very reasonable to me. So by simply implement such
feature of always allowing authors to access their documents, we would
implicitly guide repository manager to create improved workflows, which
might be a bit more difficult to implement at the beginning but would
pay off in the long term. Sounds like a win-win situation :-)
Cheers,
Samuele
--
Samuele Kaplun
Invenio Developer ** <http://invenio-software.org/>
