Hi Alexander and Sam, I agree with you Alexander in the way that the author of a record should always have read access to all the documents attached to it. If a referee process is launched and documents are produced by referees or committees, they should be submitted as new records and linked to the record being refereed.
The description you made of the main repository and smaller private repositories is what is done at CERN now. Each experiment has a private part of Invenio where they can submit work documents or notes and they have their own workflows. Benoit. On Thu, Jul 22, 2010 at 3:51 AM, Alexander Wagner <[email protected]> wrote: > Am 22.07.2010 09:11, schrieb Samuele Kaplun: > > Hi! > >> Il giorno gio, 22/07/2010 alle 08.32 +0200, Alexander Wagner ha scritto: >>> >>> Hm, WHY would those documents live WITHIN the original document? Say I > > [...] >>> >>> report to the refereed papers MARC data.) >> >> thank you very much for the answer. >> >> Indeed that sound very reasonable to me. So by simply implement such >> feature of always allowing authors to access their documents, we would >> implicitly guide repository manager to create improved workflows, which >> might be a bit more difficult to implement at the beginning but would >> pay off in the long term. Sounds like a win-win situation :-) > > Agree. :) > > One might even considering workflows that are set up at the repository > management but help out users locally in the institutes to get their > things done. > > Imagine e.g. a setup like: > > - A central repository for all publications of the whole institution > - Small areas within that repository, private to individual groups where > they can store locally needed publications and their ongoing work. > > Now, in the latter "child repositories" so to say one might want to > implement a workflow that maps essentially the publication workflow > within such a group, from "I would want to publish my results" till the > final submission to the publisher, arXiv, and the main repository. From > the idea one could think in the direction of integrating the repository > into the institutional workflows. IMHO this would solve some issues > repositories face in acceptance these days and allow to further > OpenAccess (beyond the HEP-community ;). Also I had quite some users > feedback that those are actually functionalities the scientists long > for. Some even started to implement this on their own. (But I fear for > submission of the data to the publication database they'll have to > rework their stuff quite a bit to get decent bibliographic records...) > > -- > > Kind regards, > > Alexander Wagner > Subject Specialist > Central Library > 52425 Juelich > > mail : [email protected] > phone: +49 2461 61-1586 > Fax : +49 2461 61-6103 > http://www.fz-juelich.de/zb/mitarbeiter/fachinformation#wagner > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Forschungszentrum Juelich GmbH > 52425 Juelich > Sitz der Gesellschaft: Juelich > Eingetragen im Handelsregister des Amtsgerichts Dueren Nr. HR B 3498 > Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: MinDirig Dr. Karl Eugen Huthmacher > Geschaeftsfuehrung: Prof. Dr. Achim Bachem (Vorsitzender), > Dr. Ulrich Krafft (stellv. Vorsitzender), Prof. Dr.-Ing. Harald Bolt, > Prof. Dr. Sebastian M. Schmidt > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >
