kumur2 apa menyalak ? kamu tuh Njing ?

--- In proletar@yahoogroups.com, item abu <itemabu@...> wrote:
>
> Artikel di bawah ini nunjukin gimana Clinton dan media melakukan dobel 
> standard, bermunafik ria. Ga beda dgn kelakuan orang2 Islam.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> September 17, 2012 
> Hillary Cheered Broadway's Book of Mormon, Condemns Innocence of MuslimsBy 
> Jack Cashill
> 
> Read more: 
> http://www.americanthinker.com/2012/09/hillary_cheered_broadways_book_of_mormon_condemns_innocence_of_muslims.html#ixzz26l78fNA0
> 
> 
> 
> On Thursday of last week, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton called the video 
> project Innocence of Muslims, the one that may or may not have provoked riots 
> worldwide, "disgusting and reprehensible."
> 
> Although Clinton could have seen no more than a 13-minute trailer for the 
> video,she condemned it in no uncertain terms: "Let me state very clearly -- 
> and I hope it is obvious -- the United States government had nothing to do 
> with this video.  We absolutely reject its content and message."
> 
> One would think that Clinton might have had a similar reaction to a musical 
> comedy by the name of The Book of Mormon, a satirical, scandalously 
> potty-mouthed riff on the Mormon religion.  What follows is one of the show's 
> printable lyrics, this from the song "All-American Prophet."
> 
> >
> >You all know the Bible
> >Is made of Testaments old and new.
> >You've been told it's just those two parts,
> >Or only one, if you're a Jew.
> >But what if I were to tell you
> >There's a FRESH third part out there?
> >That was found by a HIP new prophet
> >Who had a little...
> >Donny Osmond flair.
> 
> Apparently, Secretary Clinton has flexible standards.  The Associated Press 
> reported soon after The Book of Mormon's opening that "[t]he show has been 
> greeted not by protests but rhapsodic reviews and standing ovations from 
> crowds that have included 
> celebrities as diverse as Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton, 
> actor Jack Nicholson and composer Stephen Sondheim."  Indeed, the show 
> has been the biggest hit on Broadway these past two seasons, winning 
> nine Tony Awards along the way.
> 
> True, when the show premiered in 2011, the media were shocked.  NPR 
> accurately called it "blasphemous."  The Washington Post called it "acidic."  
> The New York Times called it "more foul-mouthed than David Mamet on a blue 
> streak."
> 
> But the media did not stop there -- not at all.  In context, NPR called The 
> Book of Mormon "blasphemous, hilarious and oddly endearing."  The Post called 
> the show "one of the most joyously acidic bundles Broadway has unwrapped in 
> years."  And the Times called it, foul-mouthed or not, "a newborn, 
> old-fashioned, pleasure-giving musical."
> 
> Although some likely found The Book of Mormon as "offensive and reprehensible 
> and disgusting" as White House spokesman Jay Carney found Innocence of 
> Muslims, the Obama administration chose not to denounce it.  Nor could I find 
> any protest from Carney when his former employer, TIME Magazine, praised The 
> Book of Mormon as "bright and enjoyable, and good enough to make even a 
> grumpy critic's 10 Best list."
> 
> The White House certainly did not ask the Eugene O'Neill Theater "to review" 
> whether The Book of Mormon "violates their terms of use," as it asked Google 
> to review the trailer for Innocence of Muslims.
> 
> Nor did the White House ask the FBI to interview everyone associated with 
> the show, from the set designers to the producers, as it has done for 
> Innocence of Muslims.  "We cannot and will not squelch freedom of expression 
> in this country," said Jay Carney.  "It is a foundational principle of this 
> nation." 
>  That bromide should reassure those people now being grilled by the FBI.
> 
> The media, even more than the White House, have been almost comically 
> hypocritical about Innocence of Muslims.  When Washington Post reviewer Ann 
> Hornaday called the film "vile," she stopped there.  It was not "vile, but."  
> It was just simply vile.
> 
> Hornaday struggled to rationalize her contempt for its producers.  "The 
> jumble 
> of cheesy-looking scenes and badly dubbed dialogue on display," she 
> concluded, "look less like promotional scenes culled from a fully 
> realized motion picture than a primitive piece of cynical agitprop."  
> That is all true enough, but the left's openly voiced hatred for this 
> project has little to do its with its admittedly awful production 
> values.
> 
> The Huffington Post, whose reviewer was "praying" that The Book of Mormon 
> would be "a huge hit and lead the way for more original shows like it," was 
> now leading the way to expose the culprits behind The Innocence of Muslims.  
> The publication has been running banner headlines that read "'Innocence Of 
> Muslims' Filmmaker Identified By Law Enforcement" and "'Innocence Of Muslims' 
> Shot On Hollywood Set, Film Permit Connected To Christian 
> Charity."  If the FBI asked the editorsto hand out pitchforks and publish a 
> map to the filmmaker's house, they likely would have complied.
> 
> The response by the media and the Obama administration would not have 
> surprised Christopher Hitchens.  Hitchens discovered the moral emptiness of 
> his colleagues on the left when he labored to shelter his friend, 
> Salman Rushdie.  Rushdie, a westernized progressive, provoked a deeply 
> serious death threat from the Iranian mullahs for his artful book The Satanic 
> Verses. 
> 
> In his memoir, Hitch-22, Hitchens relates his surprise upon finding the 
> "postmodern Left in 
> league with political Islam."  He cites one prominent leftist after 
> another denouncing Rushdie for having disturbed the status quo.  The 
> moral cowardice of his friends on the left depressed him almost as much 
> as the sight of crowds in British cities demanding not only "less 
> freedom," but also "the destruction of an author's work and even the 
> taking of an author's life."
> 
> For the left, Hitchens came to understand, the sensitivity to Islam had 
> much less to do with respect for religion than it did fear of offending 
> its allies in post-colonial anti-Americanism.  The "undercurrent of 
> menace and implied moral and racial blackmail" paralyzed them.  Given 
> Rushdie's status as one of their own, more or less, leftists could not 
> exactly demand his head.  But the producers of Innocence of Muslims enjoy no 
> such grace.  If they can be tied to a "Christian charity," 
> even an Egyptian one, the folks at the Huffington Post will be leading 
> the lynch mob.
> 
> By contrast, the Mormon response to the Broadway show that profanes their 
> faith has been exemplary.  Church elders have said that "the musical 
> might entertain you for a night, but the Book of Mormon, the 
> scripture, will save your life."  Individual Mormons have been lining up 
> across the street from the theater -- not protesting, but handing out 
> copies of the actual Book of Mormon.
> 
> According to TPM, a leftist blog, Mitt Romney has been "echoing [the] White 
> House position" on Innocence of Muslims.  "The idea of using something that 
> some people consider sacred and then 
> parading that out a negative way is simply inappropriate and wrong," 
> Romney said.  "And I wish people wouldn't do it."  But this is hardly an 
> echo.  Wishing people would stop is not quite the same as dispatching 
> the FBI. 
> 
> 
> The real difference, though, between Romney's response and the White House's, 
> certainly the 
> difference between his and Hillary's, is that he could and would have 
> said the very same thing about The Book of Mormon.
> 
> 
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>




------------------------------------

Post message: prole...@egroups.com
Subscribe   :  proletar-subscr...@egroups.com
Unsubscribe :  proletar-unsubscr...@egroups.com
List owner  :  proletar-ow...@egroups.com
Homepage    :  http://proletar.8m.com/Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/proletar/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/proletar/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    proletar-dig...@yahoogroups.com 
    proletar-fullfeatu...@yahoogroups.com

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    proletar-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Kirim email ke