+1 for renaming both. 2009/10/2 Samuel Lebeau <samuel.leb...@gmail.com>
> I totally agree. > `Array#isEmpty` would be useful too. > Maybe we should rename those methods and deprecate the original names in > 1.7. > > Best, > Samuel. > > 2009/10/2 Allen Madsen <bla...@gmail.com> > > I'd prefer isEmpty as well. >> Allen Madsen >> http://www.allenmadsen.com >> >> >> >> On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 3:34 PM, joneff <jon...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> >>> I've been pondering on this one for quite a long time -- why is it >>> String#empty instead of String#isEmpty? To me String.empty should be a >>> field equal / referencing the empty string and not a method. >>> >>> I was gonna hold this to my self, but the last few days there's been >>> some discussion about semantics (Element#destroy and Function.empty >>> per say) and I though may be it about time to ask this question. >>> >>> So is there any particular reason, besides #empty being shorter than >>> #isEmpty and does my suggestion make sense to you? >>> >>> >> >> >> > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Prototype: Core" group. To post to this group, send email to prototype-core@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to prototype-core-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-core?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
