String#isEmpty checks not the length of a string, but absence of non-space characters, which is quite useful i.e. in form validation.
On Sun, 04 Oct 2009 11:30:00 +0400, T.J. Crowder <t...@crowdersoftware.com> wrote: > > I'm with Robert, is there a good use case for these or should we just > deprecate them? > > But if we're going to get into renaming things, Enumerable#include is > crying out for an "s" on the end ("if this thing include*s* this other > thing then..."); without one it seems to say "include this argument in > the enumerable" -- e.g., add. > > -- T.J. :-) > > On Oct 3, 3:24 pm, Robert Kieffer <bro...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Quick reality check: Where is the value in String/Array functions that >> test for emptiness? 'These methods are nothing more than wrappers >> around code like, "if (!aString) ...", or "if (!anArray.length) ..." >> - i.e. JS already has perfectly good constructs for this. >> >> It's great that Prototype is inspired by Ruby, but much of it's charm >> is due to the fact it's done a good job of avoiding the pitfall of >> providing lots of syntactic sugar for people that don't know JS. >> >> (Nevermind that Array#empty() would seem to be synonomous with "! >> Array#any()", btw) > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Prototype: Core" group. To post to this group, send email to prototype-core@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to prototype-core-unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-core?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---