Two suggestions. A) have someone sighted next to you while on the phone with 
m-audio support, or  b) call m-audio and see if they will remote into your 
system and set it up for you.  Also they don't need to be a computer wiz  to 
follow the steps laid out in the manual. 
On Nov 13, 2012, at 9:57 PM, "Christopher-Mark Gilland" <clgillan...@gmail.com> 
wrote:

> The issue is I don't know how to enable direct monitoring on the C400.  I 
> think you gotta do it through the M-Audio control panel, which isn't 
> accessible in the least, and I lamentably don't have anyone sighted who knows 
> anything at all about what they're doing that could help me go in there and 
> turn that on.  Anyway, again, I'm probably "rambling" so I'll shut up.
> 
> Thank you kindly,
>  
> Christopher-Mark Gilland.
> Founder of CLG Productions
>  
> Blog:
> http://www.clgproductions.org
>  
> Podcast:
> http://clgproductions.podhoster.com
>  
> E-mail:
> ch...@clgproductions.com
>  
> IMessage/Facetime:
> theblindmusic...@att.net
>  
> Windows Live Messenger:
> ch...@blindperspectives.net
>  
> Twitter:
> @gilland_chris
>  
> Facebook:
> http://www.facebook.com/christopher.gilland
>  
> Skype:
> twinklesfriend2007
>  
> Send me a fax from any standard fax machine:
> 704-697-2069
>  
> Google Voice: (Please use sparingly):
> 980-272-8570
>  
>  
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: TheOreoMonster
> To: ptaccess@googlegroups.com
> Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2012 9:47 PM
> Subject: Re: Question about monitoring vocals
> 
> actually since we are recording in digital and at 24 bits there is no reason 
> to record as loud as you can with out clipping anymore. That was what you had 
> to do in the analog days to make sure the audio was up over the noise floor 
> of tape  or you would hear the tape hiss  during what you were recording.  
> You record at lower levels you have more room to bring tracks up in the mix  
> before they clip and more flexibility with    compression and other dynamics 
> effects. 
> 
> As for the original question. stop trying to monitor what is in the DAW and 
> listen to the   direct monitoring from the interface. you should have enough 
> level there   without having to crank everything up. Unless you have a reverb 
> or something else on the track  that you want to monitor yourself through 
> while recording, there is really no benefit to using the input monitor in 
> your DAW over the direct monitor of the interface. But if you  insist on 
> monitoring through the DAW, then try putting a gain plug in in one of the 
> insert slots.
> 
> On Nov 13, 2012, at 9:09 PM, Chris Norman <chris.norm...@googlemail.com> 
> wrote:
> 
>> OK, no offense, but I got bored of reading half way through the message, but 
>> here it is:
>> 
>> I'm not a pro, but I always thought you got the original signal as loud as 
>> possible without clipping. Personally, I head for as close to 0db on that 
>> gain indicator as possible, usually stopping level testing at about -3db, to 
>> account for the fact that people usually sing louder with the backing in 
>> their ears. No clue how you get anything done at -10db, but maybe I'm 
>> completely wrong.
>> 
>> If that's still not loud enough, turn the fader right up, no one cares of 
>> that fuzzes, then, if you still don't have enough, once you've got your 
>> initial level set, compress away, use the fatten or brick wall presets, and 
>> you should be fine.
>> 
>> Anyways, sorry if I missed your point, but all the extra jabber you put in 
>> your messages means about 50 paragraphs of "whatever whatever, this is 
>> completely by the point", and I'm bored out of my mind, but I think 
>> paragraph 3 said it all.
>> 
>> HTH,
>> 
>> Take care,
>> 
>> Chris Norman.
>> <chris.norm...@googlemail.com>
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On 14 Nov 2012, at 02:01, "Christopher-Mark Gilland" <clgillan...@gmail.com> 
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> OK, this may seem like quite an elementary question, and a lot of you 
>>> probably are gonna look at me and think I'm nuts for asking, but here's my 
>>> situation.
>>> 
>>> I have a pare of head phones which I've been using for a while now.  I'm 
>>> not gonna sit here and lie to you guies.  They're IFrogs.  They're not 
>>> studio-grade by any theory of the spectrom.  I do have a pare that is 
>>> studio grade, that probably in the days costed roughly 3 or 400 bucks, but 
>>> those things literally speaking are about 20 years old, and have gone 
>>> through so much wear and tare that the headband is becoming loose, and the 
>>> left ear piece is drooping down off my ear, no matter how many times I 
>>> readjust it's hinge.  Anyway, that's totally aside the point...
>>> 
>>> Basically, here's the deal.  The IFrogs I have are sort of noise 
>>> cancelling, but not really.  You'd think this would be a good thing in some 
>>> cases, but it actually's not helping matters.  The thing is, even with them 
>>> on, my voice, whether singing, or talking is not hardly canceled/muffled at 
>>> all. Because of this, I've honestly just learned to get used to the problem 
>>> I'm facing, and play devils advocate, and just say whatever, I'll deal with 
>>> it.
>>> 
>>> Basically, the thing is, I always process my vocals *after!* I have them 
>>> recorded.  Never during.  I find that if I try to do it in realtime, for 
>>> one, I can't always until the vocal track is totally laid down determine 
>>> what things need to be tweeked.  The problem however is, when I was tought 
>>> initially by Kevin, as well as others about recording vocals, I was told 
>>> you always always always! want to record at a low level, then use gain 
>>> compensation like a limiter, or say, a compressor etc. to bring the level 
>>> up to adiquit range.  With this said, my technique personally, is I always 
>>> try keeping my vocals on the input level somewhere in the neighborhood of 
>>> -12 to -10 at the most, DB.  I'm talking about the level that I see just 
>>> immediately one vo+right arrow to the right of the volume up down slider on 
>>> each track.  I try not to let it peek above -10 at the absolutely most, and 
>>> really, that's for me even a bit overkill.  Normally, I shoot for around 
>>> -12 if I can get within several decimal ranges from there, like 12-3, or 
>>> 12.5, somewhere around there.  Obviously, this is before I apply any 
>>> dynamics, or e queueing or the like.  The issue is, once I hit shift+R to 
>>> arm my track for recording, obviously, at that level of -12DB, I'm hardly 
>>> gonna hear anything through my monitors.  I know I could turn up the 
>>> headphone monitor dial on my interface, but even doing that, I'm having to 
>>> run it darned near wide open to hear anything.  Yeah, I can run the output 
>>> volume slider on the track in PT up to a higher level, but even with it as 
>>> high as it'll go at +12DB, it's barely audible until I run vocal 
>>> compression.  Basically I use the compresser/limiter dyns3 plugin, and I 
>>> change none of the parameters, but I use the vocal leveler preset, which is 
>>> under the librarian menu inside the vocals sub menu.  Even doing that 
>>> though, I'm having to run my level almost to +12DB on the slider on the 
>>> track strip within PT.  Not that that is a problem, as I can run the music 
>>> way down, to meet that of the vocal, then just pop a master fader and bring 
>>> everything back up in the final mix, but the problem is with my monitorring 
>>> through the headphones.  Being that without processing anything, I hardly 
>>> can hear my vocals at all, and if I make it loud enough that I can, then I 
>>> clip like the holy virgin Mary! Parden the pun for you religious folks... 
>>> LOL!  I just don't exactly know how would be best to work around this.
>>> 
>>> I'm  using a Blue Bluebird microphone without the shockmount, as my stand 
>>> won't        support it, plus the windscreen that came with the mike.  Then 
>>> I'm using phantom power through the mono xlr input on my interface, which 
>>> is an M-Audio Fast Track C400.  ProTools 10.0 standard, on Snow Leopard 
>>> 10.6.8, interfacing via USB, with the correct M-Audio drivers installed, 
>>> and a white stocked 13 inch macbook mid 2010.  Any help is greatly 
>>> appreciated.  I just need to know how we can get my mike on the monitor, 
>>> without clipping ramped up to a level where it can be audible, as I don't 
>>> wanna just go by well, it's armed, I know it's recording, I can hear myself 
>>> through the ear muffs. No... I wanna literally hear exactly what's going 
>>> into the DAW.
>>> 
>>> Thank you kindly,
>>> 
>>> Christopher-Mark Gilland.
>>> Founder of CLG Productions
>>> 
>>> Blog:
>>> http://www.clgproductions.org
>>> 
>>> Podcast:
>>> http://clgproductions.podhoster.com
>>> 
>>> E-mail:
>>> ch...@clgproductions.com
>>> 
>>> IMessage/Facetime:
>>> theblindmusic...@att.net
>>> 
>>> Windows Live Messenger:
>>> ch...@blindperspectives.net
>>> 
>>> Twitter:
>>> @gilland_chris
>>> 
>>> Facebook:
>>> http://www.facebook.com/christopher.gilland
>>> 
>>> Skype:
>>> twinklesfriend2007
>>> 
>>> Send me a fax from any standard fax machine:
>>> 704-697-2069
>>> 
>>> Google Voice: (Please use sparingly):
>>> 980-272-8570

Reply via email to