Hi Keith, Interested to hear you're using the Duet. Which particular version are you using? I'm interested in one of the newer ones, but I've heard that, unlike the older model which had one rotary dial, the new ones are very touch-screen based.
Many thanks, Dónal On 7 Apr 2014, at 01:38, Keith Reedy <wa9...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi folks, > > We are using, > http://www.apogeedigital.com/products/duet > > It is a work horse and sounds great! > > We print the Bible in Braille, > http://biblesfortheblind.org > Keith Reedy > God gives His best to those who leave the choice with Him. J Hudson Taylor. > > > > > > > On Apr 6, 2014, at 1:41 AM, Steve Sparrow <i...@sparrowsound.com.au> wrote: > >> Hey >> Gord. I had forgotten about the Avid solution. This sounds like a possible >> plan. I wonder how well that stuff works with voice over. I guess it would >> not be very hard to find out. Easy enough to get a mac talking anywhere for >> a demo. >> How ever, i'd also be interested in your thoughts on the pre sonus. I'm >> pretty sure you said you use one. I know a lot of people on here, and also >> midi mag use one. How do you find the mic press. I will not rule this unit >> out if the access is there and it sounds good. >> >> I also bought an octo pree myself recently and i am very happy with the >> sound i get out of it. If the pree sonus was of similar quality, I'd >> possibly go with that. If it is also compatible with mack. >> >> You bought back some memories talking about the old a dat machines. I did >> not run a dats, but i had 3 taskam d a machines locked up together running >> through an analogue mackie desk. Those were the good old analogue days. >> Not sure that i could go all the way back there now. How did we live without >> automation. But we did, and produced great music at the same time. >> SteveOn 6 Apr 2014, at 2:15 pm, Gordon Kent <dbmu...@cybernex.net> wrote: >> >>> Hey, if you are going that high=end you might want to look at one of the >>> Avid surface/interfaces. I know the digi 003 is discontinued but they must >>> have something new like that and it would be totally integrated with Pro >>> Tools. In any case, you'll need to get some a/d converters. I have the >>> Presonus 8 channel one and the focusright octa-pre with the optional a/d >>> module, and even a little behringer 8 channel converter whicch is OK for >>> feeding in the output of hardware synths or drum machines although you may >>> need to feed a clock signal into it to keep it from popping and crackling, >>> but it's only $150 or so. I've even heard of guys using their old adat >>> machines just for a/d though you would only get 16-bit resolution from >>> them. I still have one around believe it or not, at one time I had three >>> of those suckers chasing each other to lock up, and controled them with MMC >>> from the old cakewalk professional. >>> Gord >>> On Apr 4, 2014, at 8:51 PM, Steve Sparrow <i...@sparrowsound.com.au> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi Guys. I am upgrading my studio set up, and looking for a good sound >>>> card to run pro tools on mhy mack. Just wondering what some of you are >>>> running. >>>> I am very interested in the motu 896 mark 3 hybrid. Seems to have all the >>>> I o I need, and the preamps look good. >>>> I spoke to gorden kent about this card, and he gave me the upside and >>>> downside of the interface. But he has not used it on mack. >>>> I wonder how accessable it is on the mack with voice over. >>>> I have also thought about some of the r m e cards, U F X and UCX. >>>> also universal audio apollo. I know the pluggins are accessable with uad, >>>> but not sure about the asio panel. >>>> I've also thought about the pre sonus cards. although I don't think there >>>> specks are as good as far as the pree amps go. >>>> I am looking for as much I o as possible. e.g. 8 ins and outs. 8 mic line >>>> prees if possible, but not necessary, and a dat, and midi. >>>> There are Lots of great interfaces to choos from, but I'm very confused as >>>> to just what will give me good accessabillity with voice over. >>>> Any thoughts welcome. >>>> Steve >>>> >>>> -- >>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >>>> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. >>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >>>> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>> >>> >>> -- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >>> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. >>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >>> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >> >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
