public-html-comments  

Messages by Date

• 2010/10/05 Re: Formal Objection Tracker is missing a FO Sam Ruby
• 2010/10/05 Re: Formal Objection Tracker is missing a FO Bijan Parsia
• 2010/10/04 Re: Formal Objection Tracker is missing a FO Shelley Powers
• 2010/10/04 Re: Formal Objection Tracker is missing a FO Shelley Powers
• 2010/10/04 Re: Formal Objection Tracker is missing a FO Sam Ruby
• 2010/10/04 Re: Formal Objection Tracker is missing a FO Shelley Powers
• 2010/10/04 RE: Formal Objection Tracker is missing a FO Paul Cotton
• 2010/10/04 Re: Formal Objection Tracker is missing a FO Shelley Powers
• 2010/10/04 Re: Formal Objection Tracker is missing a FO Sam Ruby
• 2010/10/04 Re: HTML5 tree construction Simon Pieters
• 2010/10/04 Re: Formal Objection Tracker is missing a FO Sam Ruby
• 2010/10/04 Re: Formal Objection Tracker is missing a FO Shelley Powers
• 2010/10/04 Re: Formal Objection Tracker is missing a FO Shelley Powers
• 2010/10/04 Re: Formal Objection Tracker is missing a FO Shelley Powers
• 2010/10/04 HTML5 tree construction Felix_Schulte
• 2010/09/30 Formal Objection Tracker is missing a FO Shelley Powers
• 2010/09/30 Re: Role of this email group after October 1st Sam Ruby
• 2010/09/30 Re: Role of this email group after October 1st Shelley Powers
• 2010/09/30 Re: Role of this email group after October 1st Sam Ruby
• 2010/09/30 Re: Role of this email group after October 1st Shelley Powers
• 2010/09/30 Re: Role of this email group after October 1st Bjoern Hoehrmann
• 2010/09/30 Re: Role of this email group after October 1st Sam Ruby
• 2010/09/30 Re: Role of this email group after October 1st Shelley Powers
• 2010/09/30 Re: Role of this email group after October 1st Sam Ruby
• 2010/09/30 Re: Role of this email group after October 1st Sam Ruby
• 2010/09/30 Re: Role of this email group after October 1st Shelley Powers
• 2010/09/30 Re: Role of this email group after October 1st Shelley Powers
• 2010/09/30 Re: Role of this email group after October 1st Sam Ruby
• 2010/09/30 Role of this email group after October 1st Shelley Powers
• 2010/09/30 Re: Request that "conforming document" be better defined and more carefully referenced Noah Mendelsohn
• 2010/09/30 Re: Request that "conforming document" be better defined and more carefully referenced Noah Mendelsohn
• 2010/09/27 Re: self-closing tags in html5 William F Hammond
• 2010/09/27 Re: self-closing tags in html5 William F Hammond
• 2010/09/26 Re: self-closing tags in html5 Bjoern Hoehrmann
• 2010/09/26 Re: self-closing tags in html5 William F Hammond
• 2010/09/26 Re: self-closing tags in html5 Laura Carlson
• 2010/09/26 Re: self-closing tags in html5 Anne van Kesteren
• 2010/09/25 Re: self-closing tags in html5 Jukka K. Korpela
• 2010/09/25 self-closing tags in html5 William F Hammond
• 2010/09/24 HTML5 - 7.4.2 Focus management Guilherme Johansson Tramontina
• 2010/09/21 Re: suggestion for the HTML5 specs (src attribute on style tag) Cameron Heavon-Jones
• 2010/09/17 Re: Advice for comment Bijan Parsia
• 2010/09/17 Re: Advice for comment Sam Ruby
• 2010/09/17 Re: Advice for comment Bijan Parsia
• 2010/09/17 Re: Advice for comment Sam Ruby
• 2010/09/17 Advice for comment Bijan Parsia
• 2010/09/16 Re: HTML WG: ISSUE-120 Use of prefixes is too complicated for a Web technology Nathan
• 2010/09/15 Re: HTML WG: ISSUE-120 Use of prefixes is too complicated for a Web technology Leif Halvard Silli
• 2010/09/15 Re: HTML WG: ISSUE-120 Use of prefixes is too complicated for a Web technology Shane McCarron
• 2010/09/15 Re: HTML WG: ISSUE-120 Use of prefixes is too complicated for a Web technology Leif Halvard Silli
• 2010/09/15 Re: HTML WG: ISSUE-120 Use of prefixes is too complicated for a Web technology Shane McCarron
• 2010/09/15 Re: HTML WG: ISSUE-120 Use of prefixes is too complicated for a Web technology Leif Halvard Silli
• 2010/09/15 Re: HTML WG: ISSUE-120 Use of prefixes is too complicated for a Web technology Nathan
• 2010/09/11 Re: non-members may submit change proposals Shelley Powers
• 2010/09/10 non-members may submit change proposals Shelley Powers
• 2010/09/07 Re: volunteering for change proposal for issue 117 Shelley Powers
• 2010/09/06 Re: suggestion for the HTML5 specs Ian Hickson
• 2010/09/06 suggestion for the HTML5 specs Kertész Gábor
• 2010/09/01 Re: volunteering for change proposal for issue 117 Shelley Powers
• 2010/08/31 Re: volunteering for change proposal for issue 117 Sam Ruby
• 2010/08/31 Re: volunteering for change proposal for issue 117 Shelley Powers
• 2010/08/30 Proposal: User Interface Independence for Accessible Rich Internet Applications James Craig
• 2010/08/30 Re: Heading and Subheading Elements Dr. Olaf Hoffmann
• 2010/08/29 Re: Heading and Subheading Elements Matthew Ayres
• 2010/08/27 Comments on HTML Microdata, W3C Working Draft 24 June 2010 Thomas Baker
• 2010/08/26 Re: volunteering for change proposal for issue 117 Shelley Powers
• 2010/08/26 Re: volunteering for change proposal for issue 117 Maciej Stachowiak
• 2010/08/26 Re: volunteering for change proposal for issue 117 Laura Carlson
• 2010/08/25 Re: volunteering for change proposal for issue 117 Shelley Powers
• 2010/08/25 Re: volunteering for change proposal for issue 117 Philippe Le Hegaret
• 2010/08/25 Re: volunteering for change proposal for issue 117 Laura Carlson
• 2010/08/25 Re: volunteering for change proposal for issue 117 Shelley Powers
• 2010/08/25 Re: volunteering for change proposal for issue 117 Maciej Stachowiak
• 2010/08/25 Re: volunteering for change proposal for issue 117 Sam Ruby
• 2010/08/25 Re: volunteering for change proposal for issue 117 Shelley Powers
• 2010/08/25 Re: volunteering for change proposal for issue 117 Sam Ruby
• 2010/08/25 Re: volunteering for change proposal for issue 117 Shelley Powers
• 2010/08/25 volunteering for change proposal for issue 117 Shelley Powers
• 2010/08/25 discussion on using details as a pseudo long description Shelley Powers
• 2010/08/24 [no subject] Seth Honeycutt
• 2010/08/24 [no subject] Seth Honeycutt
• 2010/08/22 new tracker issues Shelley Powers
• 2010/08/21 three typos Martin Janecke
• 2010/08/18 Re: MessageEvent Ian Hickson
• 2010/08/18 Re: HTMLBodyElement inheritance Ian Hickson
• 2010/08/18 Re: HTML5 form attribute for form associated elements Anne van Kesteren
• 2010/08/18 Re: HTML5 form attribute for form associated elements Nathan
• 2010/08/18 HTML5 form attribute for form associated elements Thompson, John
• 2010/08/18 Re: focus and blur events Anne van Kesteren
• 2010/08/18 Re: focus and blur events Nathan
• 2010/08/18 MessageEvent Nathan
• 2010/08/18 Re: focus and blur events Anne van Kesteren
• 2010/08/18 HTMLBodyElement inheritance Nathan
• 2010/08/17 Re: HTMLIFrameElement.width and height Ian Hickson
• 2010/08/17 Re: HTMLIFrameElement.width and height Nathan
• 2010/08/17 Re: HTMLIFrameElement.width and height Ian Hickson
• 2010/08/17 HTMLIFrameElement.width and height Nathan
• 2010/08/17 focus and blur events Nathan
• 2010/08/13 HTML5 Drag-and-Drop Specification: dragenter Jason Gross
• 2010/08/12 About table summary- the proposal of 07/2007 Sailesh Panchang
• 2010/08/12 About longdesc and table summary (attribute) in HTML5 Sailesh Panchang
• 2010/08/10 About table summary in HTML5 and HTML4 Sailesh Panchang
• 2010/07/28 Script tag and accept header Jonathan Leibiusky
• 2010/07/28 Re: Restrictions for contents of script elements Ian Hickson
• 2010/07/27 Re: iframe sandbox suggestion Artur Adib
• 2010/07/27 Re: A few typos Ian Hickson
• 2010/07/27 Re: A few typos Ian Hickson
• 2010/07/27 Re: rel=sidebar queries Ian Hickson
• 2010/07/27 Re: rel=bookmark & sectioning clarification requested Ian Hickson
• 2010/07/27 Re: Typo found in HTML5 spec working draft Ian Hickson
• 2010/07/27 Re: Spelling mistake found in HTML5 spec working draft Ian Hickson
• 2010/07/27 RE: iframe sandbox suggestion Ian Hickson
• 2010/07/21 Re: Fulscreen Tag Proposal Daniel Hendrycks
• 2010/07/21 Re: Fulscreen Tag Proposal Philip Jägenstedt
• 2010/07/21 Re: Fulscreen Tag Proposal Paul Ellis
• 2010/07/21 Re: Fulscreen Tag Proposal Philip Jägenstedt
• 2010/07/21 Re: Fulscreen Tag Proposal Daniel Hendrycks
• 2010/07/21 Re: Fulscreen Tag Proposal Paul Ellis
• 2010/07/21 Re: Fulscreen Tag Proposal Philip Jägenstedt
• 2010/07/21 Re: Fulscreen Tag Proposal Paul Ellis
• 2010/07/21 Re: Fulscreen Tag Proposal Henri Sivonen
• 2010/07/20 Re: Fulscreen Tag Proposal Ron Reiter
• 2010/07/20 password alternative Nathan
• 2010/07/20 Re: Fulscreen Tag Proposal Ron Reiter
• 2010/07/20 Re: Fulscreen Tag Proposal Ron Reiter
• 2010/07/20 Re: Fulscreen Tag Proposal Daniel Hendrycks
• 2010/07/20 Re: Fulscreen Tag Proposal Ron Reiter
• 2010/07/20 Fulscreen Tag Proposal Daniel Hendrycks
• 2010/07/20 HTML5 : Geolocation in META Gectou4 ALPH@sis
• 2010/07/15 Re: Postscript-/TTF in HTML 5? Eduard Pascual
• 2010/07/15 Postscript-/TTF in HTML 5? Joerg Anders
• 2010/07/14 Cache Manifest (Offline Web Application) David Wipperfurth
• 2010/07/12 [HTML5] Missing content model category for the 'param' element Philippe Verdy
• 2010/07/12 [HTML5] undocumented 'listing' element in the rendering section: a variant of 'pre'+'code' for listing program source code ? Philippe Verdy
• 2010/07/08 Re: Serious concerns about: dom-window-nameditem Stephen Cunliffe
• 2010/07/08 Re: Serious concerns about: dom-window-nameditem T.J. Crowder
• 2010/07/08 Re: Serious concerns about: dom-window-nameditem Anne van Kesteren
• 2010/07/08 Serious concerns about: dom-window-nameditem Stephen Cunliffe
• 2010/07/06 HTML Device element status Rich Tibbett
• 2010/06/29 Re: review of HTML5 differences from HTML4 Marcos Caceres
• 2010/06/28 Re: A few typos Thomas Bouchardon
• 2010/06/28 Re: A few typos Lobotom Dysmon
• 2010/06/28 RE: review of HTML5 differences from HTML4 Paul Cotton
• 2010/06/28 Re: review of HTML5 differences from HTML4 Marcos Caceres
• 2010/06/25 Re: A few typos Thomas Bouchardon
• 2010/06/23 Re: review of HTML5 differences from HTML4 Anne van Kesteren
• 2010/06/21 Re: form owner - embedded forms or not ? Thomas Bouchardon
• 2010/06/21 Drag-and-drop processing model - dragenter Thomas Bouchardon
• 2010/06/19 Re: [canvas issue] Anne van Kesteren
• 2010/06/19 [no subject] [email protected]
• 2010/06/15 Comments on HTML Canvas 2D Context WebIDL Dominique Hazael-Massieux
• 2010/06/15 Re: Minimum requirements to class as valid HTML document. Michael(tm) Smith
• 2010/06/10 Re: Formally Object to Referencing WhatWG within the W3C HTML5 specification T.J. Crowder
• 2010/06/10 Re: Formally Object to Referencing WhatWG within the W3C HTML5 specification Bijan Parsia
• 2010/06/10 Re: review of HTML5 differences from HTML4 Marcos Caceres
• 2010/06/09 Re: Formally Object to Referencing WhatWG within the W3C HTML5 specification T.J. Crowder
• 2010/06/09 Re: Formally Object to Referencing WhatWG within the W3C HTML5 specification Bijan Parsia
• 2010/06/09 Re: Formally Object to Referencing WhatWG within the W3C HTML5 specification Bijan Parsia
• 2010/06/09 Re: Formally Object to Referencing WhatWG within the W3C HTML5 specification Shelley Powers
• 2010/06/09 Re: Formally Object to Referencing WhatWG within the W3C HTML5 specification Bijan Parsia
• 2010/06/09 Re: Formally Object to Referencing WhatWG within the W3C HTML5 specification Shelley Powers
• 2010/06/09 Re: Formally Object to Referencing WhatWG within the W3C HTML5 specification T.J. Crowder
• 2010/06/09 Re: Formally Object to Referencing WhatWG within the W3C HTML5 specification Shelley Powers
• 2010/06/09 Re: Formally Object to Referencing WhatWG within the W3C HTML5 specification T.J. Crowder
• 2010/06/09 Re: Formally Object to Referencing WhatWG within the W3C HTML5 specification Shelley Powers
• 2010/06/09 Re: Formally Object to Referencing WhatWG within the W3C HTML5 specification Bijan Parsia
• 2010/06/09 Re: Formally Object to Referencing WhatWG within the W3C HTML5 specification Shelley Powers
• 2010/06/09 Re: Formally Object to Referencing WhatWG within the W3C HTML5 specification Shelley Powers
• 2010/06/09 Re: Copyright on HTML5 spec? Bijan Parsia
• 2010/06/09 Re: Copyright on HTML5 spec? Anne van Kesteren
• 2010/06/09 Copyright on HTML5 spec? Bijan Parsia
• 2010/06/09 Re: Formally Object to Referencing WhatWG within the W3C HTML5 specification Bijan Parsia
• 2010/06/08 Re: Formally Object to Referencing WhatWG within the W3C HTML5 specification Shelley Powers
• 2010/06/08 Formally Object to Referencing WhatWG within the W3C HTML5 specification Shelley Powers
• 2010/06/08 Re: review of HTML5 differences from HTML4 Anne van Kesteren
• 2010/06/05 Re: review of HTML5 differences from HTML4 Steve
• 2010/06/04 rel=sidebar queries Nathan
• 2010/06/04 rel=bookmark & sectioning clarification requested Nathan
• 2010/06/04 Minimum requirements to class as valid HTML document. Nathan
• 2010/05/31 Proposal for Locators inside html-documents (LocDocs) Kaseluris, Nikos
• 2010/05/17 Comment regarding the "up" value for the rel attribute Goderre,Laurent [NCR]
• 2010/05/10 Re: Spelling mistake found in HTML5 spec working draft T.J. Crowder
• 2010/05/10 Spelling mistake found in HTML5 spec working draft Michael Rakowski
• 2010/05/10 Typo found in HTML5 spec working draft Michael Rakowski
• 2010/05/06 Re: Onstorage Event Jeremy Orlow
• 2010/05/05 Onstorage Event Jaikishan Jalan
• 2010/05/05 Determining real visibility in HTML5 Philip Gladstone
• 2010/05/04 Re: Can accessing the device microphone and camera be added to HTML5? Jock Murphy
• 2010/05/04 Strange 'drag' event Ivan Suhinin
• 2010/05/04 Re: Can accessing the device microphone and camera be added to HTML5? T.J. Crowder
• 2010/05/03 Re: form name attribute values T.J. Crowder
• 2010/05/03 Re: Can accessing the device microphone and camera be added to HTML5? Ian Hickson
• 2010/05/03 Re: Can accessing the device microphone and camera be added to HTML5? Ian Hickson
• 2010/05/03 Re: Can accessing the device microphone and camera be added to HTML5? Nathan
• 2010/05/02 Re: Can accessing the device microphone and camera be added to HTML5? Julian Reschke
• 2010/05/02 Re: Can accessing the device microphone and camera be added to HTML5? Ian Hickson
• 2010/05/02 Re: Can accessing the device microphone and camera be added to HTML5? Ian Hickson
• 2010/05/02 Re: Can accessing the device microphone and camera be added to HTML5? Eduard Pascual
• 2010/05/02 Re: Can accessing the device microphone and camera be added to HTML5? Jock Murphy
• 2010/05/02 Re: Can accessing the device microphone and camera be added to HTML5? Jock Murphy

• Earlier messages
• Later messages