March 3, 2020
-
S3 PRs
-
https://github.com/pulp/pulp_file/pull/358 - waiting on second review
from dkliban or mikedep333
-
https://github.com/pulp/ansible-pulp/pull/247 - waiting on
review/merge from dkliban or mikedep333
-
https://github.com/pulp/plugin_template/pull/188 - template
-
Update the Dockerfile.j2 (with conditional jinja2 logic based on a
var) instead of before_install.sh.j2
-
Github Actions
-
Feedback so far?
-
Next sprint, move a plugin over to Github Actions?
-
https://github.com/pulp/pulp_npm/pull/2
-
daviddavis to propose on pulp-dev list
-
We’re installing pulp-smash from source. Should we switch to the pypi
package?
-
Yes: https://pulp.plan.io/issues/6285
-
Ansible check mode added to ansible-pulp CI. Will this affect runtime by
much?
-
Ansible-pulp: CentOS 7 not tested in certain tests.
-
MD: I recall there being a reason several months ago.
-
CentOS 8 test being added, but we should check if the 8GB RAM of Travis
/ GHA will be used up. It would be 4 containers tested in parallel.
-
Mike did research into centos stream; we’re relying on 8.2.
-
Pulplift CI with nested virt? <https://github.com/pulp/pulplift/pull/66>
-
Dkliban will update ticket and make sure it’s added to the sprint
https://pulp.plan.io/issues/5610
-
FYI: No real progress made on branch support in ansible-pulp CI over
last week due to Mike’s business / sickness.
-
FYI: Fixed a horrible CI bug
<https://github.com/pulp/ansible-pulp/pull/249>, like the “source”
scenarios installing pulp_file a 2nd time rather than pulp_rpm
-
No pulp_rpm / pulp_rpm_prerequisites bug slipped into a release
because of this.
-
FYI: Be aware of other files that need to be modified, especially
during PR time.
- FYI: Fixed a bug
<https://github.com/pulp/ansible-pulp/pull/244/files>that I had to
workaround several months ago.
David
_______________________________________________
Pulp-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
