Does anyone else have an opinion? If not, I am going to start by writing a
task to remove this name uniqueness constraint for repositories.

On Wed, Jul 1, 2020 at 9:21 AM Ina Panova <[email protected]> wrote:

> This name uniqueness problem is extended to remotes and distributions, and
> probably some other objects.
>
>
> --------
> Regards,
>
> Ina Panova
> Senior Software Engineer| Pulp| Red Hat Inc.
>
> "Do not go where the path may lead,
>  go instead where there is no path and leave a trail."
>
>
> On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 11:14 PM Grant Gainey <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Jun 30, 2020 at 4:56 PM Daniel Alley <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Why would it cause pain (to relax the restriction)?
>>>
>>
>> Oh, good point - I was thinking backwards.  Carry on, carry on... :)
>>
>> G
>> --
>> Grant Gainey
>> Principal Software Engineer, Red Hat System Management Engineering
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pulp-dev mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Pulp-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
>
_______________________________________________
Pulp-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev

Reply via email to