On Tue, Jul 21, 2020 at 8:14 AM Dennis Kliban <dkli...@redhat.com> wrote:
> Does anyone else have an opinion? If not, I am going to start by writing a > task to remove this name uniqueness constraint for repositories. > Import/export relies on non-pulp_id-uniqueness to identify Things. I was assuming we were talking about adding pulp_type to the Repository uniqueness-constraint, so that a given name/type would be unique (which would require a single change to RepositoryResource <https://github.com/pulp/pulpcore/blob/master/pulpcore/app/modelresource.py#L35> ) If we're talking about just removing the uniqueness-constraint altogether, then life gets a lot harder. G -- Grant Gainey Principal Software Engineer, Red Hat System Management Engineering
_______________________________________________ Pulp-dev mailing list Pulp-dev@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
