Agreed. David
On Tue, Jul 21, 2020 at 8:42 AM Grant Gainey <ggai...@redhat.com> wrote: > On Tue, Jul 21, 2020 at 8:14 AM Dennis Kliban <dkli...@redhat.com> wrote: > >> Does anyone else have an opinion? If not, I am going to start by writing >> a task to remove this name uniqueness constraint for repositories. >> > > Import/export relies on non-pulp_id-uniqueness to identify Things. I was > assuming we were talking about adding pulp_type to the Repository > uniqueness-constraint, so that a given name/type would be unique (which > would require a single change to RepositoryResource > <https://github.com/pulp/pulpcore/blob/master/pulpcore/app/modelresource.py#L35> > ) > > If we're talking about just removing the uniqueness-constraint altogether, > then life gets a lot harder. > > G > -- > Grant Gainey > Principal Software Engineer, Red Hat System Management Engineering > _______________________________________________ > Pulp-dev mailing list > Pulp-dev@redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev >
_______________________________________________ Pulp-dev mailing list Pulp-dev@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
