On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 3:48 PM, Luke Kanies <[email protected]> wrote:
> > On Sep 15, 2009, at 3:44 PM, James Turnbull wrote: > > > Luke Kanies wrote: > >> But we definitely need a way of saying "these tickets should, if at > >> all possible, get fixed before the next release". > > > > And that should be a triage rule using Priority IMHO - "All these > > tickets marked blah must be fixed before we pull the trigger" > > > That's what *I've* been saying, just get Markus to agree with you. :P > So if our criterion is "*don't push until all tickets marked High or greater are fixed*," and we have the patches for ten Normals, two Highs, a Critical and an Immediate done, approved, tested, and ready to go when out of the blue a new High that we have no idea how to fix comes in do we just not release anything until we solve it? Who, exactly, benefits from such a policy? -- Markus --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-dev?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
