*wouldn't On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 9:24 PM, Ken Barber <k...@puppetlabs.com> wrote: >> True. So what I suggested was either give nodes a special status to change >> the top-scope, which seems to be universally acknowledged as a bad idea. > > I would define it as 'universally acknowledged'. As an incremental > change its not a bad idea, since it works in with what we've got. If > we're going to take a bigger picture view and re-work a bunch of > stuff, then everything changes and we'd need to review the whole > proposal. > > ken.
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Developers" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-dev@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-dev?hl=en.
