On Dec 7, 8:11 am, jcbollinger <john.bollin...@stjude.org> wrote: > that makes a lot more sense then having to > put some arbitrary portion of the server's path _to the module_ into > the URL.
But of course, that's not what the "modules" bit is actually intended to mean (sorry). Obviously, the file serving docs and the File docs are out of sync. I still maintain that it would be worthwhile to try the URL form I suggested, if only because it would be quick and easy to do. If Puppet has a bug in resolving the URL to a file name then it might be that one form works but the other doesn't. Additionally, Eric didn't mention which version of Puppet he is using; it may be older than the first one that implements the /modules mount point. John -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-us...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
