On Jan 7, 2011, at 3:35 PM, Jeff McCune wrote: > OK, so what if declaring* a class always added it to the top scope? > This seems like a relatively straight forward solution to a great many > concerns. The language doesn't change, existing manifests continue to > work and only the convention of relying on the order of variable > definitions is affected. The problem of resource defaults also almost > entirely goes away too. This was proposed in the original discussion > about scoping back in July and I'm just curious if there's any new > information in this area.
Just some more feedback. I'd always assumed it did this. I probably would have found out the hard way if I hadn't read it here. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-us...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
