I have started a new thread for this purpose, called "Documentation Requirements."
On Friday, July 20, 2012 4:41:58 PM UTC-5, Ryan Coleman wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 2:25 PM, Nick Fagerlund wrote: > > Anyway, back to the point: I recommend that you start a new thread on > this > > group talking about what you and your people need in terms of module > > documentation formats. Ryan Coleman, the product owner for modules and > the > > Puppet Forge, is the person who will be figuring out our requirements > for > > that tool going forward, and I think he's already been doing some > thinking > > about it, but he could use your input and real-life use cases. > > Yep, thanks Nick! > > I have indeed been thinking about this tool a lot lately and will be > getting some improvements to it into the pipeline soon. To that end, > I'd absolutely to hear more about what you want to achieve. Nevermind > what the tool does today.. what did you want to do with it? > > As Nick said, starting a new thread about what you want from the tool > would be awesome. Please do! > > > What makes a > > PDF of module docs a good fit for your site? What else could fit those > > needs? Do you want to be able to write your comments in something other > than > > Rdoc format? That kind of thing. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/puppet-users/-/umYMwvE8BKEJ. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to puppet-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/puppet-users?hl=en.
