On Tue, 3 May 2011 15:30:18 -0400, Frédéric Bastien <no...@nouiz.org> wrote: > For the new name of .gpudata, what about using .data as numpy? The > only problem that I see is that people use the new gpu array with > numpy code and that the numpy code use the .data without checking if > its an numpy.ndarray first. I don't think this is going to be a real > problem. What do you think?
I don't like .data because that's what pyopencl presently uses like .gpudata, so that has the same all-of-a-sudden-noncontiguous problem as PyCUDA's .gpudata. As much as possible, I'd like to keep the two interfaces the same. Are you strongly opposed to .bytes and .contig_bytes as new names? Andreas
pgp3x4x2FAWaW.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ PyCUDA mailing list PyCUDA@tiker.net http://lists.tiker.net/listinfo/pycuda
