nvm i just got to see which one wil be the best for what im doing On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 8:29 AM, Matt Pearson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> i agree, does the wrapper have a name, or is it on the python/pygame sites > > > On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 8:13 AM, René Dudfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> yeah, best to use both! Use each tool where it is best at - and get >> best of both worlds! >> >> cu, >> >> On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 12:53 AM, Peter Gebauer >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > Hi guys! >> > >> > I agree, just wanted to add that many iterations over trivial code >> benefits >> > (speed-wise) tremendously from being written in C and accessed in >> Python, or >> > at least that is my experience. :) >> > Guess you have to weigh it against the added complexity of having to >> compile >> > C code, maybe for mulitple platforms, etc. >> > >> > On 2008-11-05 (Wed) 13:57, Greg Ewing wrote: >> >> Patrick Mullen wrote: >> >>> On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 12:55 AM, Greg Ewing < >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> >> >>>> The only way to improve speed is to re-code the cpu-intensive >> >>>> parts using something more efficent, such as C or Pyrex. >> >>> >> >>> Or, of course, write better python code if possible in those parts. >> >> >> >> Yes, certainly -- finding a better algorithm is always >> >> the best form of optimization! >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Greg >> >> >> > >> > >
