Moshe Zadka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> As long as you're breaking things anyway, let me suggest one change:
> have the "Gtk" prefix stripped from the classes' names (GtkText -> Text,
> etc) [...]
For one, I would be happy to make that change, as well (partly because
I've not that much written so far :-).
However, should we write `Gtk.FILL' instead of `FILL'? Just from an
aesthetical viewpoint, since we already use `GDK.' to prefix GDK constants,
maybe we should import GTK and write `GTK.FILL', or just `from GTK import *'
if we like to stay terse with GTK constants. The need of another import
might be unwelcome, but on the other hand, `import gtk, GTK, GDK' is easy
to write on one line.
I'm not sure of anything, beside the fact I would like to turn `GtkText' into
`Gtk.Text'. We might even guess that `pygtk' intensive applications/users
would like `from gtk import *' still, and just use unprefixed `Text'.
What is not nice is having the module name repeated in module objects.
--
François Pinard http://www.iro.umontreal.ca/~pinard
-
To unsubscribe: echo "unsubscribe" | mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]
