On Fri, Mar 28, 2008 at 2:48 PM, Mike Orr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > This discussion shows Pylons needs some kind of flexible but standard > system of authentication & authorization. It has also been clear from > the past several months that AuthKit provides *a* unified solution for > both issues, but it has not gained sufficient acceptance from the > Pylons community to be *the* standard. > this comes as a shock to me, I though authkit was defacto just like mako, SA,etc. I'm just starting to read up on authkit, and so far I though it only had outdated documentation, but the fact that noone has back it up as a good path in this thread makes me wonder if I'm doing the right thing. Could someone summarize or point to a summary of the common issues people have with authkit? as for repoze how ready are you? will I have to work of trunk?
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pylons-discuss" group. To post to this group, send email to pylons-discuss@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pylons-discuss?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
