On Thu, Sep 15, 2005 at 10:04:09AM +0100, Michael Hudson wrote: > Lots of people are interested (though maybe they shouldn't be) in a > non-GIL implementation of Python. Offering different concurrency > models is a really big selling point of PyPy, I think.
This is what I'm working on (though from an academic context :), and I've been in somewhat of a holding pattern recently - doing some small experiments with CPython, reading and following mailing lists/IRC, trying to figure out when PyPy is finished enough that I can start doing work. Of course, if there's something I can do to help PyPy get to this point, I'll help. Has anyone written anything about the (at least near-term) plans for PyPy in the area of concurrency/locking? -- Nicholas Riley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | <http://www.uiuc.edu/ph/www/njriley> _______________________________________________ pypy-dev@codespeak.net http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/pypy-dev
