On Tuesday 28 December 2010 18:55:23 Algis Kabaila wrote: > The immediately above is unnecessarily confusing and breaks the > requirement of not counting backwards version numbers. > Acceptible, however, would be: > > (1, 0, 0, 1) > (1, 0, 0, 2) > etc > up to > (1, 0, 1)
I prefer the approach suggested by Tamás Bajusz, use the same as Python itself uses: (1, 0, 0, "beta2") and "1.0.0-beta2" (1, 0, 0, "beta3") and "1.0.0-beta3" (1, 0, 0, "final") and "1.0.0" Anyone have something against it? -- Hugo Parente Lima INdT - Instituto Nokia de Tecnologia
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ PySide mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openbossa.org/listinfo/pyside
