On Wednesday 29 December 2010 09:22:24 Hugo Parente Lima wrote: > On Tuesday 28 December 2010 21:15:34 Anderson Lizardo wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 5:43 PM, Hugo Parente Lima > > > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Tuesday 28 December 2010 18:55:23 Algis Kabaila wrote: > > >> The immediately above is unnecessarily confusing and > > >> breaks the requirement of not counting backwards > > >> version numbers. Acceptible, however, would be: > > >> > > >> (1, 0, 0, 1) > > >> (1, 0, 0, 2) > > >> etc > > >> up to > > >> (1, 0, 1) > > > > > > I prefer the approach suggested by Tamás Bajusz, use the > > > same as Python itself uses: > > > > > > (1, 0, 0, "beta2") and "1.0.0-beta2" > > > (1, 0, 0, "beta3") and "1.0.0-beta3" > > > (1, 0, 0, "final") and "1.0.0" > > > > > > Anyone have something against it? > > > > I agree that the format used by Python itself is the one > > most developers will expect to see. > > > > Just a small correction: sys.version_info format is: > > > > major, minor, micro, level, serial = sys.version_info > > > > In this case it would be: > > > > (1, 0, 0, "beta", 2) > > > > and for final: > > > > (1, 0, 0, "final", 0) > > hmmm... now I understood the meaning of the serial element in > the docs :-P, thanks! > > > Regards,
Great! Good example how following Python helps. Good luck in doing it, Hugo! +1 Al. Al. -- Algis http://akabaila.pcug.org.au _______________________________________________ PySide mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openbossa.org/listinfo/pyside
