On Tuesday 28 December 2010 21:15:34 Anderson Lizardo wrote: > On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 5:43 PM, Hugo Parente Lima > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Tuesday 28 December 2010 18:55:23 Algis Kabaila wrote: > >> The immediately above is unnecessarily confusing and breaks the > >> requirement of not counting backwards version numbers. > >> Acceptible, however, would be: > >> > >> (1, 0, 0, 1) > >> (1, 0, 0, 2) > >> etc > >> up to > >> (1, 0, 1) > > > > I prefer the approach suggested by Tamás Bajusz, use the same as Python > > itself uses: > > > > (1, 0, 0, "beta2") and "1.0.0-beta2" > > (1, 0, 0, "beta3") and "1.0.0-beta3" > > (1, 0, 0, "final") and "1.0.0" > > > > Anyone have something against it? > > I agree that the format used by Python itself is the one most > developers will expect to see. > > Just a small correction: sys.version_info format is: > > major, minor, micro, level, serial = sys.version_info > > In this case it would be: > > (1, 0, 0, "beta", 2) > > and for final: > > (1, 0, 0, "final", 0)
hmmm... now I understood the meaning of the serial element in the docs :-P, thanks! > Regards, -- Hugo Parente Lima INdT - Instituto Nokia de Tecnologia
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ PySide mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openbossa.org/listinfo/pyside
