On Monday 03 January 2011 22:33:03 Algis Kabaila wrote: > On Wednesday 29 December 2010 09:22:24 Hugo Parente Lima wrote: > > On Tuesday 28 December 2010 21:15:34 Anderson Lizardo wrote: > > > On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 5:43 PM, Hugo Parente Lima > > > > > > > I prefer the approach suggested by Tamás Bajusz, use the > > > > same as Python itself uses: > > > > > > > > (1, 0, 0, "beta2") and "1.0.0-beta2" > > > > (1, 0, 0, "beta3") and "1.0.0-beta3" > > > > (1, 0, 0, "final") and "1.0.0" > > > > hmmm... now I understood the meaning of the serial element in > > the docs :-P, thanks! > > > > > Regards, > > Last year :) there was a discussion about the minor version > identification. This year (today) I've recompiled the pyside on > a VM (Virtual Machine) to see how the version looks like: > > *********************** > a...@ubuntu:~/sandbox/newbie_examples/pyside-version$ python > Python 2.6.6 (r266:84292, Sep 15 2010, 15:52:39) > [GCC 4.4.5] on linux2 > Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more > information. > > >>> import PySide > >>> print PySide.__version__ , PySide.__version_info__ > > 1.0.0 (1, 0, 0) > > *********************** > > What is the ETA for "1.0.0.beta2" and (1, 0, 0, "beta2") ?
The beta3 will be released this week, hopefully with this new __version__ information, it's very easy/fast to implement and I'm just waiting to finish the things I have to get done before put my hands on it. > OldAl. > > Algis > http://akabaila.pcug.org.au -- Hugo Parente Lima INdT - Instituto Nokia de Tecnologia
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ PySide mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openbossa.org/listinfo/pyside
