On Wed, Aug 1, 2018 at 6:44 PM Mariatta Wijaya <mariatta.wij...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Thank you for the responses and concerns. > > I do want to keep this discussion open and ongoing, and I still think that we > do need a set deadline on things.
I talked to a few core developers recently (at EuroPython and over messengers) and I had an impression that some of them don't like an idea of making a decision faster than everybody has a chance to say their word. Some of them are shy to publicly object to having strict deadlines, some probably haven't yet seen this thread, some don't have time to engage right now. You also see a few -1s in this very thread. All in all, I really don't understand why we need to hurry here. > Currently any undecided PEP is stalled, and no one can pronounce on them. And maybe that's OK for a few months? I don't recall Guido ever accepting PEPs promptly. :) Setting strict deadlines really seems like a last-resort option. > And we probably won't/can't promote any new core devs until we have new > governance. IIRC we always promoted core devs by popular vote, so I don't think this would be a problem. Do we have any candidates that are currently waiting for us deciding on a governance model? Yury _______________________________________________ python-committers mailing list python-committers@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers Code of Conduct: https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
