On Thu, Aug 2, 2018 at 4:43 PM Brett Cannon <br...@python.org> wrote: > > On Wed, 1 Aug 2018 at 17:58 Yury Selivanov <yselivanov...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> On Wed, Aug 1, 2018 at 8:29 PM Mariatta Wijaya >> <mariatta.wij...@gmail.com> wrote: >> [..] >> > I'm open to extend the dates, and even wait another year if we need to. >> > Or do folks want to come up with a completely different process than what >> > I've proposed? >> > >> > In the end, I just want to know whether we will come to decision before >> > 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, .. ? >> >> IMHO we should tweak the proposal to include just *one date for now*: >> we want everybody interested to post their proposals by October 1st >> (we can shift it + 2 weeks if people are on vacations right now). > > > I was actually going to email suggesting this but Mariatta beat me to the > subject. :) >
I think you've confused Mariatta with me here :) > For me, I think aiming for October 1st to get the initial proposals in is a > good goal. Yeah it looks like people don't oppose having October 1st as our first *soft* sync point as long as we don't set any other deadlines right now. To sum up: * We want everybody who has ideas about future Python governance model to submit their initial proposals by that date. * The discussion will start around October 1st and we'll figure out what we do next (and when) based on its outcome. I think this plan is reasonably relaxed, but at the same time will gently motivate us to move forward. Yury _______________________________________________ python-committers mailing list python-committers@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers Code of Conduct: https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
