On Wed, Aug 1, 2018 at 8:29 PM Mariatta Wijaya <mariatta.wij...@gmail.com> wrote: [..] > Please don't misunderstand my wanting to set up a deadlines and process as > wanting to rush things.
Absolutely, I understand, I didn't want to imply that "[name] is rushing the process". Sorry if I sounded this way. I do have an impression, though, that a large population of core devs is OK with deadlines and the other sizable population doesn't understand why we need a strict schedule right now. > I'm open to extend the dates, and even wait another year if we need to. > Or do folks want to come up with a completely different process than what > I've proposed? > > In the end, I just want to know whether we will come to decision before 2019, > 2020, 2021, 2022, .. ? IMHO we should tweak the proposal to include just *one date for now*: we want everybody interested to post their proposals by October 1st (we can shift it + 2 weeks if people are on vacations right now). The discussion will inevitably start as soon as we have a couple proposals on the table. Some proposals will be withdrawn, some will require tweaks, people also might come up with new proposals. We can then decide what our next steps (and deadlines!) considering what will be the outcome of these first debates. Yury _______________________________________________ python-committers mailing list python-committers@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers Code of Conduct: https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct/