On Thu, 2 Aug 2018 at 00:24 Ronald Oussoren via python-committers < python-committers@python.org> wrote:
> > > > On 2 Aug 2018, at 01:06, Yury Selivanov <yselivanov...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Wed, Aug 1, 2018 at 6:44 PM Mariatta Wijaya > > <mariatta.wij...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > > > >> Currently any undecided PEP is stalled, and no one can pronounce on > them. > > > > And maybe that's OK for a few months? I don't recall Guido ever > > accepting PEPs promptly. :) Setting strict deadlines really seems > > like a last-resort option. > > That, and it might be acceptable to start with a consensus based model for > accepting PEPs at first. That would help in getting it clearer what we > really need going forward (which as several people have stated is more than > just deciding on PEPs). That would mean that contentious PEPs would have > to wait longer, but that isn’t necessarily a bad idea. > So basically you want to see if we can find consensus on using consensus for PEPs? ;) Or put another way, basically this seems to suggest giving the consensus/voting approach a chance without specifically saying you want to give other proposals on how to model PEPs a chance as well because deciding by consensus is still a governance model. Personally I would rather say that we are in a language moratorium until we resolve this governance situation and if that means Python 3.8 is a boring release then so be it.
_______________________________________________ python-committers mailing list python-committers@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers Code of Conduct: https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
