Le 26/03/2019 à 09:58, M.-A. Lemburg a écrit : > >>> Asking people who have voted -1 or +1 to publicly tell the world why >>> they did so is not helpful in this respect, since it just creates bias. >>> What people, who are unsure how to vote, really need, is more >>> information, not bias. >> >> This is illogical. Knowing how and why certain people voted is useful >> information when you know that person (and it's also why we generally >> use options like -1, -0, +0, +1, and sometimes +/-100 ;) ). Without this >> added information, the *only* thing we have is bias, and I don't think >> we have a big enough group to average out individual bias in such >> important decisions as this. > > I guess we have a different understanding of bias, then :-) > > I prefer to base my votes and opinions on available information > much more than other people's votes and opinions. Using their > votes to cover up for lack of information does not make me > feel comfortable, so I try to get more information or abstain.
The reason I'd like to know why people voted -1 is not because I plan to vote like them (I can vote on my own - or, in these cases, not vote). It's that I'd like to know what kind of objections people have against those particular contributors becoming core developers. Regards Antoine. _______________________________________________ python-committers mailing list python-committers@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers Code of Conduct: https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
