The process for PEP 544 is off-topic for that thread so I'm starting a new one.
I have promised its author to approve it after certain minor changes (that we both agree on) have been made. It's not an example of how PEP acceptance in general will works until governance is sorted out though -- PEP 544 is a very unique special case. (For one, it's uncontroversial -- the reason it's not been accepted yet is that its author is busy with other things.) On Wed, Oct 3, 2018 at 9:12 AM Jeroen Demeyer <j.deme...@ugent.be> wrote: > On 2018-10-03 17:06, Łukasz Langa wrote: > > That's the only > > reason why PEP 544 is not yet accepted for example. > > Did you actually try to get PEP 544 accepted or to appoint a > BDFL-Delegate? I don't find any discussions about PEP 544 after the > stepping down of the BDFL. > -- --Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido)
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
