On Thu., 4 Oct. 2018, 4:12 am Antoine Pitrou, <solip...@pitrou.net> wrote:
> On Wed, 3 Oct 2018 22:51:24 +0900 > INADA Naoki <songofaca...@gmail.com> wrote: > > 2018年10月3日(水) 21:24 Jeroen Demeyer <j.deme...@ugent.be>: > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > > > > I am well aware of the current governance issues, but several people > > > have mentioned that the BDFL-Delegate process can still continue for > > > now. > > > > > > Really? > > I don't know process to assign BDFL-delegate without BDFL. > > That's probably why we should call it "PEP-delegate" :-) > > Consensus would obviously work (if no-one opposes the proposed person, > then surely we don't need an elaborate governance model to decree that > said person can become the PEP delegate, no?). > I was figuring we could treat it as a caretaker mode governance: anything we do before the new governance model is formalised is subject to ratification by the new council members (or the new BDFL if that option ends up being chosen). In this case, I'd consider it unlikely for either the PEP delegate appointment or any decisions about the PEP itself to be overturned - while it's a complex topic that definitely needs to go through the PEP process in order to work out the technical details, it isn't especially controversial in its own right (the most controversial aspect is whether it needs a new C level slot or not, and the PEP should clearly lay out the pros and cons of that) Cheers, Nick. > Regards > > Antoine. > > > _______________________________________________ > Python-Dev mailing list > Python-Dev@python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev > Unsubscribe: > https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/ncoghlan%40gmail.com >
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
