I think whatever governance we end up with would have named you BDFL-delegate anyway, Guido, so I think you're just taking the time machine for a spin again. ;)
On Wed, 3 Oct 2018 at 09:40, Guido van Rossum <gu...@python.org> wrote: > The process for PEP 544 is off-topic for that thread so I'm starting a new > one. > > I have promised its author to approve it after certain minor changes (that > we both agree on) have been made. It's not an example of how PEP acceptance > in general will works until governance is sorted out though -- PEP 544 is a > very unique special case. (For one, it's uncontroversial -- the reason it's > not been accepted yet is that its author is busy with other things.) > > On Wed, Oct 3, 2018 at 9:12 AM Jeroen Demeyer <j.deme...@ugent.be> wrote: > >> On 2018-10-03 17:06, Łukasz Langa wrote: >> > That's the only >> > reason why PEP 544 is not yet accepted for example. >> >> Did you actually try to get PEP 544 accepted or to appoint a >> BDFL-Delegate? I don't find any discussions about PEP 544 after the >> stepping down of the BDFL. >> > > -- > --Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido) > _______________________________________________ > Python-Dev mailing list > Python-Dev@python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev > Unsubscribe: > https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/brett%40python.org >
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
