-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Jan 27, 2009, at 6:21 PM, Raymond Hettinger wrote:
If something gets left in 3.0.1 and then ripped-out in 3.1, I think
we're
doing more harm than good. Very little code has been ported to 3.0
so far. One there is a base, all changes become more difficult.
In the interests of our users, I vote for sooner than later.
Also, 3.0 is a special case because it is IMO a broken release.
AFAICT, it is not in any distro yet. Hopefully, no one will keep it
around
and it will vanish silently.
I stand by my opinion about the right way to do this. I also think
that a 3.1 release 6 months after 3.0 is perfectly fine and serves our
users just as well.
Barry
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Darwin)
iQCVAwUBSX+fNnEjvBPtnXfVAQJO1QQAmRVH0tslNfRfpQsC+2jlJu5uljOVvuvN
uE3/HFktxLUr6NPdOk+Ir1r2p4mQ5iXFlZbJvOSNckM3UYSFkeKmS/T0nVJzqx89
+23sv7UC2Qf8zJRJBEhzuePT1iAE8OybRH1Vxql9ka8FVzCrZHt2JhnRZUmHNblT
Y2d92iL7eqE=
=Qzdr
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
