Am 19.06.2010 15:09, schrieb Arc Riley: > Just because legacy Python needs to be kept around for a bit longer for > a few uses does not mean that "Python 3 is not ready yet". Any decent > package system can have two or more versions of Python installed at the > same time. > > It is not "critical self-evaluation" to repeat "Python 3 is not ready" > as litany in #Python and your supporting website. I use the word > "litany" here because #Python refers users to what appears to be a > religious website http://python-commandments.org/python3.html > > I have further witnessed (and even been the other party to) you and > other ops in #Python telling package developers, who have clearly said > that they are working to port their legacy package to Py3, that "Python > 3 is not ready". One of our Summer of Code students this year actually > included in his application that he was told (strongly) in #Python that > he shouldn't be working with Py3 - even after he expressed his intent to > apply under the PSF to help with the Py3 migration effort as his project.
Ouch. Looks like it's time for the PSU to release the 10-ton wei _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
