On 25.02.2011 09:25, "Martin v. Löwis" wrote: > Am 25.02.2011 09:17, schrieb Dirkjan Ochtman: >> On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 09:09, "Martin v. Löwis" <mar...@v.loewis.de> wrote: >>> I think I would have liked the strategy of the PEP better (i.e. >>> create clones for feature branches, rather than putting all >>> in a single repository). >> >> Unnamed heads are trivial to convert to clones. > > If there are hundreds of them, it's far from trivial. I don't even know > how to find out which one to convert.
The full-history repo has several ways to get at that information, so it's quite for us to extract feature branches as separate clones. Since most side-track branches won't actually be needed anymore, we'd like to reconstruct them on request. I assume you'd like to have pep-0383? Georg _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
