On 27 February 2011 01:40, Nick Coghlan <ncogh...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, Feb 26, 2011 at 4:34 PM, Georg Brandl <g.bra...@gmx.net> wrote: > >> Would it be possible to name "trunk" as "2.x" instead? Otherwise I > >> could see people getting confused and asking why trunk was closed, > >> and/or not the same as "default". > > > > Problem is, you then have 1.5.2 released from the 2.x branch :) > > In that case, "legacy-trunk" would seem clearer.
+1 Exactly what I was about to suggest. Tim Delaney
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
